Cosmic Cash Grab: Lunar Burials Raise Ethical Eyebrows

Cosmic Cash Grab: Lunar Burials Raise Ethical Eyebrows

Remember NASA's Artemis 1 attempt earlier this year? While the technical hiccups grabbed the headlines, a less-noticed aspect sparked important ethical and legal questions: commercial lunar burials. Yes, that's right. We're talking ashes on the Moon, courtesy of companies like Astrobotic offering "vanity canisters" for a cool £400.

But as space exploration privatizes, is sending your nan's dentures to the Moon really a good idea? Let's unpack the ethical and legal maze surrounding this celestial trend.

Open for Business, with Caveats:

Astrobotic's Peregrine lander was supposed to be humanity's first commercial lunar burial service. While private payloads need approval, it only covers safety, security, and foreign policy, not ethics. This lack of clear guidelines opens a Pandora's box of questions:

    • Sacred spaces: Indigenous groups like the Navajo consider the Moon sacred and oppose its use as a cemetery. Should their concerns be addressed in commercial ventures?
    • Earthly laws in space: Ashes have specific handling and transport regulations in different countries. Do these extend to extra-terrestrial destinations?
    • What's rubbish, what's treasure?: Earth's orbit is littered with defunct satellites and Elon Musk's Tesla (yes, really!). Where do we draw the line between culturally significant artifacts and space junk?

Legal Labyrinth:

The Outer Space Treaty, while declaring space "the province of all mankind," fails to address commercial activities. Existing laws like the Artemis Accords focus on protecting historical sites, but not commercial missions. And nobody owns the Moon to grant burial rights anyway.

So, who's responsible for ensuring responsible space conduct? Here's where things get tricky:

    • States' responsibility: The Outer Space Treaty requires states to authorize and supervise activities in space. But how do they regulate private endeavours on celestial bodies?
    • National space laws: Some countries, like Indonesia and New Zealand, have provisions to refuse payloads deemed against their national interest. Others, like Australia and the UK, might need to adapt their laws as commercial space activities intensify.

Navigating the Future:

While Artemis 1's lunar mail may not have reached its destination, it triggered a crucial conversation about ethical and legal boundaries in space. Here are some takeaways:

    • Private space is here to stay: We can't turn back the clock on commercial ventures, but ensuring responsible practices is crucial.
    • Legal framework needed: Existing laws are inadequate for the complexities of commercial space activities. Robust international frameworks are needed to address issues like lunar burials.
    • Balancing progress and ethics: As we venture further into the cosmos, striking a balance between exploration and cultural respect is paramount. Leaving your goldfish on the Moon might not be the legacy you'd want.

The Moon landing was a giant leap for mankind. Now, as we privatize space, ensuring it doesn't become a celestial landfill or disrespectful dumping ground requires careful consideration. It's time to chart a course towards responsible space exploration, with ethics and respect for our universe woven into every lunar kilometre.

 

You’ve come this far…
Why not venture a little further into A.S.S. - our exclusive Australian Space Society. 

And keep thrusting Australia into the deep unknown…

#Space_Aus

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.

Supporter Merchandise

1 of 4